Q and A From "The Forerunner"

Q and A From "The Forerunner"

Q. When we are baptized in the Holy Spirit, what should we see happening in our lives and what should others see when they look at us.

A. Great Question. You have gotten ahead of me on this one. That is the very thing I'm going to be dealing with on Sunday, June 3rd. I will be examining the terms used for what the Holy Spirit does in a believer and also the visible results of that. If it's not answered to your satisfaction, then send a text question again!

Q. Is there anything in the Bible that says a woman cannot baptize other? Does one need to be an ordained minister to baptize?

A. The quick answer to both your questions is "no." The longer answer is that while there is no rule that says a woman cannot baptize, there is no example in the Bible of a woman baptizing. Does not mean it didn't happen, it is just not recorded. Are there examples of women baptizing in early church history? Not that I am aware. The Scriptures do not recognize non-male ordained leadership. So the first three centuries of the church were led by qualified men and baptism was administered by such.

Does one need to be ordained to baptize. The answer is yes and no. This varies according to church tradition. In Baptist life, generally an ordained or licensed minister can baptize. There is nothing in Scripture that prohibits a non-ordained person from baptizing another person, but it should be under the authority of a local church. We are baptized into Christ and into His body, His local and visible body. Not just randomly dunked.


2 comments (Add your own)

1. Narutoo wrote:
I’d like to invite you to relfect for a moment on a possibility you’ve probably never seriously considered in your entire life…. The Mormon church is not true. I have no ill feelings toward the church, I think it is a marvelous organization. So let me explain my motivation…Have you ever heard of something called “cognitive dissonance”? Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding conflicting ideas simultaneously. The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance. They do this by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and actions. Dissonance can also be reduced by justifying, blaming, and denying. For example, let's say you buy a Rolex watch. You paid a ton for it, but after a while you realize that it may not keep time quite as well as your old Timex. Nor is it as comfortable on your wrist. Cognitive dissonance emerges here, because you are of the opinion that the Rolex is superior, yet your memory tells you that you enjoyed the cheaper Timex better. Sometimes, we can't acknowledge the truth. So we rationalize. Sometimes it takes someone else pointing out to us, You sure do have to adjust the time on that thing a lot, don't you? Only then do we objectively relfect on the situation and see the truth. I’d like to be that friend for you, since I spent many, many years of cognitive dissonance in the church. I grew up in the Mormon church, attended seminary, served a mission for the church (including serving as AP), and graduated with honors from BYU. I believed the church was true because everybody important in my life told me it was true, and it felt good to believe that a caring, personal God was looking out for me and giving me purpose to my existence. When events in my life gave evidence that the church was true, I held them closely, as confirmation of what I had already accepted as truth. Any evidence that casted doubt on my beliefs I quickly rejected and tried to ignore. And yet, as a rational, sane human being I subconsciously had to acknowledge the myriad contradictions in the Mormon faith. For example, I experienced cognitive dissonance when I learned that Joseph Smith illegally practiced polygamy and publically denied it his entire life (including in the church owned newspaper Times and Seasons). I’ve held an original copy in my hands of the general conference report after JS death where Brigham Young announced for the first time the doctrine of polygamy. Cohesion is a basic test of truth. If a proposition has contradictory elements, then it cannot be true. Eventually I realized that all the problems disappeared with one simple assumption… the church is a man-made institution, however well intentioned it may be.

Fri, August 10, 2012 @ 11:18 PM

2. qenowc wrote:
iYSIkq kpsnqymlhfgt

Sat, August 11, 2012 @ 5:43 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.

The Village Revolution